Sujit Choudhry is widely considered to be a seasoned legal maverick with an acute focus on comparative constitutional law. As a reliable expert in his field, Sujit Choudhry is credited with serving as an advisor to multiple constitution building initiatives, governance strategies, and lawmaking processes for over two decades in countries such as Tunisia, Yemen, Ukraine, South Africa and much more. Sujit Choudhry’s remarkable expertise has also come in handy when settling ceasefires and unprecedented conditions characterized by political violence while also offering unrivaled legal guidance to civil society groups and leading stakeholder forums.
Expounding on President Trump, Twitter, and the First Amendment
More recently, Sujit Choudhry grabbed the headlines by shedding essential insight on social media and its unique role U.S politics and beyond. With President Trump moving into the White House, Twitter has undoubtedly become the President’s favorite site. Not only does he use it to share his unfiltered opinions on various national and international issues but also as an efficient tool to reigning in disruptive foreign leaders, get info on (Facebook.com).
With the President tweeting more than ever before, the former White House Press Secretary quickly reassured the public that the President’s tweets should be considered to be official statements by the Commander-In-Chief of the United States, source (Works.bepress.com). Not only that, but the President’s tweets have also been referenced in various court rulings associated with blacklisting transgender citizens in the U.S military and the infamous travel ban. Suffice to say, Foreign Leaders have not taken kindly to the President’s tweets.
A controversial debate sprung up in recent weeks highlighting the legality of blacklisting Twitter users with regard to the U.S Constitution. From the ensuing debate, the Knight First Amendment Institute of Colombia expeditiously filed a lawsuit to challenge the legality of seven individuals banned from the site.
The United States Supreme Court categorically states that the First Amendment applies to the entire federal government as opposed to Parliament alone. The law essentially states that Congress is not entitled to make any law that infringes on the freedom of the press or public to exercise free speech or appeal to the government for legal redress, based on patch.com.